<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: After the Deadline IntenseDebate Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:10:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilfox</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-23612</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evilfox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-23612</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[;) good job men! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  good job men! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Dingman</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathan Dingman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is there a way to use ATD&#039;s WordPress.org plugin with the non-visual editor?  I never, ever, use the visual editor, but would LOVE to use this plugin.

Any details would be greatly appreciated please.

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there a way to use ATD&#8217;s WordPress.org plugin with the non-visual editor?  I never, ever, use the visual editor, but would LOVE to use this plugin.</p>
<p>Any details would be greatly appreciated please.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tanner</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11579</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tanner]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is great. Now people can understand each other better. Thanks a lot! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great. Now people can understand each other better. Thanks a lot! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photomatt</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11494</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[photomatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice post! I&#039;m also excited about this feature. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post! I&#039;m also excited about this feature. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Fischmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafael Fischmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks a lot for the quick reply. I look forward to that. :) 
 
I also like your name, I don&#039;t know why. Haha. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks a lot for the quick reply. I look forward to that. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I also like your name, I don&#039;t know why. Haha. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmudge</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsmudge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 22:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Rafael (great name BTW), 
AtD isn&#039;t a wrapper on an open source library, it&#039;s a new product taking a data heavy / machine learning approach to the proofreading problem.  When AtD supports more languages (part of the development path!) we&#039;ll investigate how to make it available to you. 
 
-- Raphael ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rafael (great name BTW),<br />
AtD isn&#039;t a wrapper on an open source library, it&#039;s a new product taking a data heavy / machine learning approach to the proofreading problem.  When AtD supports more languages (part of the development path!) we&#039;ll investigate how to make it available to you. </p>
<p>&#8211; Raphael </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafael Fischmann</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafael Fischmann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[English-only, right? Anyway, that&#039;s very nice. 
 
Any plans for additional languages, like the ones IntenseDebate itself now supports? ;) ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>English-only, right? Anyway, that&#039;s very nice. </p>
<p>Any plans for additional languages, like the ones IntenseDebate itself now supports? <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rsmudge</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rsmudge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know what&#039;s causing that bug you just mentioned.  The highlighting is a regex replace (sorta, it&#039;s smarter than just a straight replace, but not by much) and AtD is contained in the links that are made by AtD.  I&#039;ll address this. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what&#039;s causing that bug you just mentioned.  The highlighting is a regex replace (sorta, it&#039;s smarter than just a straight replace, but not by much) and AtD is contained in the links that are made by AtD.  I&#039;ll address this. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: donnacha &#124; WordSkill</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[donnacha &#124; WordSkill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow. Seriously: Wow!!   
   
This feature is an astonishingly useful addition to ID. A big &quot;Hell, Yes!&quot; to Michael, Raphael and the ID team.   
   
I have a few first impressions that I&#039;d like to share:   
   
The &quot;Checking Spelling&quot; text changes to &quot;Edit Comment&quot; when you are in AtD mode - a more intuitive wording might be &quot;Continue Writing&quot;.   
   
It would be helpful if the transition between both modes could be made more obvious. For instance, you could give the text field a very pale yellow background when in AtD mode, reverting back to white when returning to writing mode.   
   
It might also be a good idea to add an extra highlight to the &quot;Continue Writing&quot; button, to cue people who have accidentally entered AtD mode and are confused. You already have the transition between the two different labels but a slight color change or thin red border might make the change more obvious i.e. people will instantly know that the feature is &quot;active&quot;.   
   
This is just a random wild thought but, if you could make the button reflect the current mode more clearly, you could probably afford to lose the text labels altogether and just have the spell-check icon - just give it an obvious highlight when in editing mode, no need for the text, people will get the idea and it&#039;s generally better to avoid text in the UI if you can anyway. Removing the text would also leave more room for other plugin icons, thereby increasing the number of site owners who opt to use AtD.   
   
The ID AtD implementation seems to be better than the one on WordPress.com, because it is quite easy to end up with some parts of the post field in WP containing the AtD red underlines even when you are back in writing mode, which might be a tad confusing for some people, not sure which mode they are currently in. So, the ID implementation seems a lot cleaner in that respect.   
   
There does seem to be a slight bug when, within AtD mode, you click on a misspelling to see the AtD suggestions but don&#039;t pick one and return to writing mode. This sometimes leaves some extraneous text. For instance, I ended one of the above paragraphs with the words &quot;site owners who opt to use AtD&quot;. In AtD mode, I was amused to see that the abbreviation &quot;AtD&quot; is not recognized, so, I clicked on it to see what alternatives it suggested. When I returned to writing mode, that sentence changed to &quot;site owners who opt to use AtD.suggest(this);&quot;&gt;AtD&quot;, clearly some sort of artifact from my use of the pop-up menu.  This occurs in both Safari and Chrome under OS X, but not FireFox.  
   
Again, thank you so much for continuing to improve ID, it is exciting to think about where Automattic will be in six months time with innovators such as AtD and ID onboard. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Seriously: Wow!!   </p>
<p>This feature is an astonishingly useful addition to ID. A big &quot;Hell, Yes!&quot; to Michael, Raphael and the ID team.   </p>
<p>I have a few first impressions that I&#39;d like to share:   </p>
<p>The &quot;Checking Spelling&quot; text changes to &quot;Edit Comment&quot; when you are in AtD mode &#8211; a more intuitive wording might be &quot;Continue Writing&quot;.   </p>
<p>It would be helpful if the transition between both modes could be made more obvious. For instance, you could give the text field a very pale yellow background when in AtD mode, reverting back to white when returning to writing mode.   </p>
<p>It might also be a good idea to add an extra highlight to the &quot;Continue Writing&quot; button, to cue people who have accidentally entered AtD mode and are confused. You already have the transition between the two different labels but a slight color change or thin red border might make the change more obvious i.e. people will instantly know that the feature is &quot;active&quot;.   </p>
<p>This is just a random wild thought but, if you could make the button reflect the current mode more clearly, you could probably afford to lose the text labels altogether and just have the spell-check icon &#8211; just give it an obvious highlight when in editing mode, no need for the text, people will get the idea and it&#39;s generally better to avoid text in the UI if you can anyway. Removing the text would also leave more room for other plugin icons, thereby increasing the number of site owners who opt to use AtD.   </p>
<p>The ID AtD implementation seems to be better than the one on WordPress.com, because it is quite easy to end up with some parts of the post field in WP containing the AtD red underlines even when you are back in writing mode, which might be a tad confusing for some people, not sure which mode they are currently in. So, the ID implementation seems a lot cleaner in that respect.   </p>
<p>There does seem to be a slight bug when, within AtD mode, you click on a misspelling to see the AtD suggestions but don&#39;t pick one and return to writing mode. This sometimes leaves some extraneous text. For instance, I ended one of the above paragraphs with the words &quot;site owners who opt to use AtD&quot;. In AtD mode, I was amused to see that the abbreviation &quot;AtD&quot; is not recognized, so, I clicked on it to see what alternatives it suggested. When I returned to writing mode, that sentence changed to &quot;site owners who opt to use AtD.suggest(this);&quot;&amp;gt;AtD&quot;, clearly some sort of artifact from my use of the pop-up menu.  This occurs in both Safari and Chrome under OS X, but not FireFox.  </p>
<p>Again, thank you so much for continuing to improve ID, it is exciting to think about where Automattic will be in six months time with innovators such as AtD and ID onboard. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephane Daury (stephdau) 's status on Thursday, 08-Oct-09 20:04:25 UTC - Identi.ca</title>
		<link>http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/#comment-11483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephane Daury (stephdau) 's status on Thursday, 08-Oct-09 20:04:25 UTC - Identi.ca]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.intensedebate.com/?p=1833#comment-11483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  <a href="http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.intensedebate.com/2009/10/08/after-the-deadline-intensedebate-plugin/</a>  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

